Development economics

TV Interview: Reduction of the interest rate

Posted on

I was on CGTN discussing the decision of the Monetary Policy Committee to reduce the Central Bank Rate, in the context of an interest rate cap.


Shifts in China Africa Should Watch

Posted on

This article first appeared in my weekly column with the Business Daily on March 18, 2018

Over the past few weeks the Two Sessions of the annual meetings of the national legislature and the top political advisory body in China, have been happening. A great deal of attention has been focused on this Two Sessions perhaps because this is the first annual sessions opened under the guidance of Xi Jinping’s Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era. There are key points of interest for Africa.

The first is President Xi Jinping’s focus on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics; he delivered a speech on this in October 2017 to the National Congress of the Community Part of China. One of the key takeaways for Africa is not only how he sees the role of democracy within the context of Chinese socialism, he also made the point that it is time for China to have a say in the realm of ideology. It is not a secret that Europe and North America have been very overt and aggressive in selling democracy as a governance and political ideology to Africa for decades. It seems that Xi Jinping is hinting that it is time for China to have a stronger presence in this ideological space and share the principles of Socialism with Chinese characteristics with the world.

Image result for xi jinping


This is important because this Two Sessions occurs during a time of growing insularity, xenophobia and inwardness in Europe and North America. Indeed, reports indicate that China projects diplomatic spending to hit USD 9.5 billion this year, double 2013’s outlay. The Trump administration, indicates momentum in the other direction and has proposed spending of USD 37.8 billion, down from USD 55.6 billion last year. Given these dynamics, it will be interesting to see if or how Xi Jinping will make bolder steps so that China becomes a true global leader, which includes power in the realm of global ideology, and the extent to which Africa will be a point of focus.

The second key point of interest of the Two Sessions for Africa is the intent to stem corruption in the Chinese government. A key focus of Two Sessions was to ratify a law to set up a new powerful anti-corruption agency. Africa’s struggle with corruption is a well-known fact, and for the most part, African governments have seemed either unwilling or unable to control corruption in their ranks. Africa will therefore have great interest in seeing how the anti-corruption agency will be structured, the powers it will be given and how those found to be corrupt will be penalised.

Related image


Thirdly, this Two Sessions has seen the growing importance of environmental concerns as a government priority.  This seems to stem not only from an understanding in the Chinese government that environmental degradation must be addressed as a strategic concern for the country and economy, but also as a response to growing demands from the Chinese public for responsible environmental behaviour and action as part of the country’s development model going forward. This is a shift Africa welcomes and there will be interest in seeing the extent to which environmental concerns will be integrated into Chinese activity on the continent going forward.

Anzetse Were is a development economist;


TV Interview: What Can Africa Expect from China’s Two Sessions?

Posted on

In this CGTN interview I highlight the implications of the Two Sessions, China’s most important political gathering, for Africa.

Dynamics of Innovation in Africa

Posted on

This article first appeared in my weekly column with the Business Daily on March 11, 2018

Last week I attended the Innovation Summit organised by The Economist magazine. The event was focused on digital transformation for accelerated growth in Africa. There are several points I want to share concerning the interface between the public and private sector, and innovation.

With regards to the private sector, an interesting point raised is that innovation targeting private sector must have a business case for adoption otherwise the innovation won’t be absorbed. Innovation must demonstrate that the short term inconvenience of adoption will pay off in the long term. Private sector is skeptical of ‘model changes’ and any model claiming innovation must be clear on the value it will deliver. So innovation must provide a proof of concept before it can be adopted and scaled.

Image result for innovation


Secondly, the lack of data in Africa means we don’t know what the real situation is on the continent but more importantly it means that the data that we do have is over weighted and given extra significance that it not necessarily merited. We have a real problem with information asymmetry and data bias. Data is the core of innovation so Africa must solve this problem if we are to make informed strategic decisions.

Thirdly, private sector must deal with the fact that the lack of data on the continent impedes the absorption and spread of innovation because strategies for market penetration and sharing cannot be rolled because the lack of data means private sector is often going in blind. Private sector often doesn’t know where the market sits. So private sector innovation may have created a valid solution, but the lack of data makes penetration and scaling very difficult.

Additionally, public sector needs to know that rent seeking and corruption cancel the benefits that could have been accrued by innovation. Africa cannot fully leverage innovation with strong networks of corruption in place. As long as government engages in corruption, Africa will not fully leverage the benefits of innovation.

That said, sometimes innovation from private sector is not quickly adopted by government which frustrates private sector. Slow adoption by government is often because government is obligated to ensure the innovation does no harm, a factor that may not feature strongly in the private sector lens. Indeed, sometimes government policy is so stringent that it stifles innovation.  But the question is, how can government policy be structured to foster innovation while ensuring the innovation won’t inadvertently do public harm?

Form left: Arab Bank Economic Development in Africa director-general Carlos Lopes, Safaricom chief innovation officer Kamal Bhattacharya and ICT principal secretary Victor Kyalo during the Innovation Summit Africa 2018  in Nairobi last week. PHOTO | SALATON NJAU | NMG


Another point of concern is what Africa needs to have in place to leverage innovation. How can Africa fully leverage innovation if basics are not taken care of? Sure we can leapfrog things like telephone lines but innovation will be crippled if issues such as infrastructure are not addressed. Some basics have to be in place for innovation to really work.

Finally, often innovation in Africa is rooted in the lack of key services by government. Private sector innovation is often rooted in developing a solution that plugs the gap that government services should fill. So what’s the way forward? Does government enable private sector to go on with the innovation or does government adopt the innovation and take over? What are the cost implications? Is there a mandate problem?

Anzetse Were is development economist;


TV Interview: The State of Unemployment in Kenya

Posted on

On March 4, I was part of a TV panel discussing the state of unemployment in Kenya, the concerns, dynamics and recommendations on the way forward.

Three Options for Fiscal Policy

Posted on

This article first appeared in my weekly column with the Business Daily on March 4, 2018

The Cabinet Secretary of Treasury, Henry Rotich, it putting together the budget for 2018/19, the first in the second era of devolution, being developed in a context where a second Eurobond has been issued and there is growing concern about the sustainability of Kenya’s debt. This is also the first budget in the second and last term for President Kenyatta and thus can give an insight into the type of fiscal legacy the president intends to leave. Fiscal policy over Kenyatta’s first term has been defined by three main features. The first is subpar revenue generation; while revenue generation has been growing, revenue targets are often not met, and revenue is not growing at a rate that can effectively fund expenditure. The second feature is aggressive growth in expenditure where the 2018/19 budget looks to be about KES 2.5 trillion, up from KES 1.6 trillion in 2013/14. This has led to the final feature of fiscal policy which is an expanding appetite for debt. Rotich has three main options for fiscal policy the 2018/19 financial year.

Treasury CS Henry Rotich can change tack and truly implement aggressive austerity measures. file photo | nmg


Firstly, the budget can be more or less what has been done in the past. And if one looks at the February 2018 Budget Policy Statement (BPS), it seems as though this year’s budget will be more of the same. Allocations to dockets are within similar ranges as in the past, expenditure has grown aggressively and the aggressive appetite for debt continues. Should Rotich choose to stick to this fiscal path, concerns over the country debt growth will continue to be voiced as it is precisely this fiscal path that has gotten Kenya to the stage at which we are now.

Secondly however, Rotich can change tact and truly implement aggressive austerity measures in the context of fiscal consolidation where concrete policies are created to reduce government deficits and debt accumulation and results tracked. Several bodies have called for fiscal consolidation and thus it would be prudent for the Treasury to heed that call. The concern with previous budgets is that Treasury asserts that austerity measures will be implemented and spending cut, but budget implementation indicates that this does not actually happen. Rotich has a chance to make significant cuts in unnecessary spending, enforce fiscal discipline, allocate more money to development spending and implement measures to ensure development funds are absorbed.

Image result for fiscal policy


The final path is one where Rotich puts significant funds into President Kenyatta’s Big Four and uses expenditure to finance the sectors of health, industrialisation, housing and agriculture in order to catalyse economic growth, create jobs and reduce poverty. Rotich can present the argument that prudent and disciplined spending targeting the four dockets will put Kenya on a growth path where the country hits the Vision 2030 growth rate of 10 percent. Sadly, however, there is no indication of notable fiscal support to the Big Four in the February BPS. There is a section dedicated to the Big Four in the BPS but if one takes a close look at allocations, one finds no difference in allocation patterns that would indicate that the fiscal process is focused on the Big Four.

In short, the budget for 2018/19 will set the tone of fiscal policy making for the next four years and let Kenyans and the world know, the extent to which government will leverage fiscal policy to put the country on a dynamic growth path that is fiscally sustainable and catalytic.

Anzetse Were is a development economist;


Tax compliance must go beyond the mandate of the Kenya Revenue Authority

Posted on

This article first appeared in my weekly column with the Business Daily on February 25, 2018

A key concern for the government at the moment is how to generate and collect more revenue in order to more effectively fund expenditure and reduce the need for debt. Kenya, like much of Africa, struggles with revenue generation and collection. Indeed reports indicate that the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) is likely to miss its revenue targets in the current financial year. According to the Brookings Institution, average tax revenues stand at about 15 percent of GDP in sub-Saharan Africa, compared with 24 percent in OECD countries. Government has made it clear that it seeks to generate and collect more revenue, but there are several factors that inform whether individuals and firms are willing to be tax compliant.

Image result for taxes


Research on tax compliance attitudes in the Afrobarometer journal found that there are several factors that inform tax compliance. The first is that if individuals perceive that it is difficult to evade tax, they are more likely to have a tax compliant attitude. Secondly, individuals who are more satisfied with public service provisions are more likely to have a tax compliant attitude. Thirdly, frequent payment to non-state actors, such as criminal gangs, in exchange for protection, reduces the likelihood of having a tax compliant attitude. Fourthly, there is indication that individuals who perceive that their ethnic group is treated unfairly by the government are less likely to have a tax compliant attitude.  I would add a final factor where if individuals feel government misuses or embezzles public finances, it reduces the likelihood of tax compliant attitudes.

Kenya struggles with all the factors above. First, it is relatively easy to evade tax in Kenya; reports indicate that an audit of the accounts of multinational companies revealed that Kenya lost USD 350 million in three years through tax evasion. Secondly, Kenyans are not satisfied with the provision of public services and are disgruntled by the fact that despite paying taxes, they do not seem to accrue the benefits associated with compliance.

Thirdly, Kenya businesses are often forced to make onerous payments to both state and non-state actors in exchange for the license to continue their business activity.  Both formal and informal businesses complain of harassment, even by government officials, for bribes. Making such payments negatively informs the willingness to be tax compliant as such out of pocket payments are an illegal and unjust expense. Fourthly, given the levels of tribalism in the country, it is feasible that some Kenyans may be less willing to be tax compliant because they are of the view that they are treated unfairly by government.

Image result for bribe


Finally, when Kenyans hear of billions of shillings ‘going missing’ and being misappropriated, many see no point in paying tax as they are of the view that they will not benefit from tax compliance since their money will be ‘eaten’ by a government official rather than be of benefit to them.

Thus, if government seeks to engender long-term tax compliance in Kenya, these issues must be addressed. Kenyans must be satisfied with public service provision, state actors must stop demanding bribes from businesses, government needs to demonstrate that it is the government of all Kenyans regardless of tribe and the embezzlement of public funds must be addressed.

The mandate of encouraging tax compliance is not one that can be saddled on the KRA alone. This is an effort that must be pursued across all of government at both national and county levels.

Anzetse Were is a development economist;